Young v. State , 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 278 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Latrail R. Young appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment” denying his Rule 29.15 “Amended Motion to Vacate Judgments and Sentences and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing,” alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.

    We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 99864

Citation Numbers: 424 S.W.3d 465, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 278, 2014 WL 931072

Judges: Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless

Filed Date: 3/11/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024