Bolden v. State , 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 568 ( 2014 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emily Bolden (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing. Movant argues she was denied her right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).