Fattig v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Order

    PER CURIAM.

    Anthony Fattig appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction re*269lief due to abandonment. Fattig contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because the court failed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. For reasons explained in a Memorándum provided to the parties, we affirm.

    AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. WD 77054

Judges: Hardwick, Mitchell, Pfeiffer

Filed Date: 8/26/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024