Roberts v. State ( 2014 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Kevin D. Roberts appeals the judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. Mr. Roberts claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s question to him on cross-examination about the credibility of the self-defense story. He further claims that the question was an impermissible comment on post-arrest and pre-Miranda silence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).