Carter v. State , 463 S.W.3d 810 ( 2015 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latoya Carter appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

1 . All rule references aré to Mo.R. Crim.P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.