Sumpter v. State ( 2015 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darius Sumpter (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).