-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. George Jones appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
Document Info
Docket Number: ED 101329
Citation Numbers: 477 S.W.3d 46, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2015 WL 3609504
Judges: Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald
Filed Date: 6/9/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024