Peters v. Peters , 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 367 ( 2016 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Janet Peters appeals from the judgment denying her Amended Motion for Attorneys Fees on Appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our - decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).