Harris v. State ( 2016 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

• James Harris (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).