-
ORDER -
PER CURIAM Charles Hervey appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035
1 motion for post-conviction relief without an eyidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record- on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo. banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a- memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. ED 102518
Citation Numbers: 491 S.W.3d 253, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 222
Judges: Lisa, Odenwald, Sullivan
Filed Date: 3/15/2016
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024