Boyd v. State , 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    Per curiam:

    Thomas Boyd appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. Boyd argues that there was not a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea, and that his two claims for ineffective assistance of counsel were not refuted by . the record as found by the *864motion court. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: WD 79426

Citation Numbers: 505 S.W.3d 863, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2016 WL 7438733

Judges: Ardini, Martin, Newton

Filed Date: 12/27/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024