Jackson v. State , 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086 ( 2016 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Denise Jackson appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24. 035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).