Henson v. Pascola Stave Co. , 165 Mo. App. 5 ( 1912 )


Menu:
  • CAULFIELD, J.

    The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Upon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the majority opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. For the reasons *7given in that opinion the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.

    Reynolds, P. J., concurs. Nortoni, J., dissents, being’ of the opjinion that the plaintiff was not a fellow-servant with those engaged in loading cars in the forest.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 165 Mo. App. 5

Judges: Being, Cars, Caulfield, Engaged, Fellow, Forest, Nortoni, Plaintiff, Reynolds, Servant, That

Filed Date: 4/2/1912

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2022