Bolden v. State , 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 397 ( 2005 )

157 S.W.3d 410 (2005)

Donnie R. BOLDEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 63757.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 15, 2005.

Dimitra Y. Massey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniels, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie Bolden appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).