-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. Wayne Woltering appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. ED 101935
Citation Numbers: 462 S.W.3d 825, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 588, 2015 WL 3485575
Judges: Cohen, III, Richter
Filed Date: 6/2/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024