-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. Eugene Carrington (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him uneniT ployment benefits. We find the Commission did not ‘err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci
*559 sion. The decision, of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. ED 102073
Citation Numbers: 464 S.W.3d 558, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2015 WL 3879637
Judges: Cohen, III, Richter
Filed Date: 6/23/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024