Martin v. State ( 2017 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

David L. Martin appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be' served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).