Inge v. State , 534 S.W.3d 296 ( 2017 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daryl Inge, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).