W. Case v. 3rd Judicial District ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                     DI ORIGINAL                                          03/08/2022
    INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                              Case Number: OP 22-0102
    OP 22-0102                  FilLE0
    MAR 0 .8 2022
    WILLIAM TREVOR CASE,                                              Bowen Greenwood
    Clerk of Supreme Court
    Stain nf Montana
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ORDER
    MONTANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT, DEER LODGE COUNTY,
    HONORABLE RAY DAYTON, PRESIDING,
    Respondent.
    By petition filed March 1, 2022, Petitioner and underlying Defendant William
    Trevor Case (Case) petitions this Court for exercise of writ of supervisory control in the
    underlyingmatter of State v. Case, Cause No. DC 21-100, Montana Third Judicial District
    Court, Deer Lodge County. Case seeks extraordinary review and reversal of the District
    Court's judgment, filed February 17, 2022, denying his motion for suppression of evidence
    resulting from a warrantless police entry into his home on September 27, 2021. He asserted
    below that the warrantless search violated the warrant and probable cause requirements of
    the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 11, of the
    Montana Constitution. The State asserted, and the District Court found and concluded
    upon hearing, that the warrantless search was constitutionally permissible based on exigent
    circumstances that created a reasonable belief that Case was suicidal, armed, and had either
    already shot himself with a gun or was about to. Here, Case does not dispute that exigent
    circumstances existed, but asserts that the warrantless search was nonetheless unlawful in
    violation of the Fourth Amendment and Article II, Section 11, because police made the
    warrantless entry into his home on a welfare check, without probable cause of criminal
    activity. He thus asserts that the District Court is proceeding under a manifest mistake of
    law. He further asserts that ordinary appeal will be inadequate and gross injustice will
    result if he is forced to go through a trial on a felony assault of a police officer alleged to
    have occurred after police illegally entered his home.
    Pursuant to Article VII, Section 2(2), of the Montana Constitution, this Court has
    "general supervisory control over all other Montana courts. We generally exercise
    supervisory control only by discretionary writ under extraordinary circumstances,
    including where a lower court is proceeding under a mistake of law which, if left
    uncorrected prior to final judgment, will result in significant injustice for which ordinary
    appeal will not be an adequate remedy. M. R. App. P. 14(3); Park v. Mont. Sixth Judicial
    Dist. Ct., 
    1998 MT 164
    , ¶ 13, 
    289 Mont. 367
    , 
    961 P.2d 1267
    . However, we will not allow
    supervisory control to substitute for ordinary appeal at the convenience of the parties and
    will generally exercise it "[o]nly in the most extenuating circumstances." State ex reL
    Ward v. Schmall, 
    190 Mont. 1
    , 4, 
    617 P.2d 140
    , 141 (1980). In our discretion, we may
    order a summary response to a petition for supervisory control or deny and dismiss it
    without response. M. R. App. 14(7).
    Upon our review, Case's petition is insufficient to meet his threshold burden of
    demonstrating that the District Court is proceeding under a manifest mistake of law, much
    less that ordinary appeal will be an inadequate remedy. See, e.g., Estate of Frazier v.
    Miller, 
    2021 MT 85
    ,    7   16 and 26, 
    404 Mont. 1
    , 
    484 P.3d 912
     (under the community
    caretaker doctrine, the public duty of police is not limited to criminal law enforcement and
    extends to rendering aid in a non-criminal investigative capacity to citizens who are
    apparently in need of imminent aid in furtherance of their health and safety); Brigham City
    v. Stuart, 
    547 U.S. 398
    , 403-04, 
    126 S. Ct. 1943
    , 1947 (2006) (an "exigency obviatine the
    search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment prohibition of unreasonable searches
    and seizures "is the need to assist persons who are seriously injured or threatened with such
    injury"—police may thus "enter a home without a warrant to render emergency assistance
    to an injured occupant or to protect an occupant from imminent injury"); Mincey v.
    Arizona, 
    437 U.S. 385
    , 392-93, 
    98 S. Ct. 2408
    , 2413 (1978) ("Fourth Amendment does not
    bar police . . . from making warrantless entries and searches when they reasonably believe
    that a person within is in need of immediate aid"—the "need to protect or preserve life or
    2
    avoid serious injury is justification for what would be otherwise illegal absent an exigency
    or emergency"—internal punctuation and citations omitted).
    IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Case's petition for writ of supervisory control
    is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED. This ruling does not prejudice or preclude review
    of the merits of the subject assertion of error in the ordinary course on direct appeal.
    The Clerk is hereby directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to all parties
    of record and the Hon. Ray Dayton, presiding, in the underlying matter of State v. Case,
    Cause No. DC 21-100, Montana Third Judicial District Court, Deer Lodge County.
    DATED this ci``Lt-----Thday of March, 2022.
    /yr .,41L
    Justices
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: OP 22-0102

Filed Date: 3/8/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/8/2022