State v. C. Stone ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                  ORllGillAL                                                08/24/2021
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                               Case Number: DA 21-0070
    DA 21-0070
    FLED
    STATE OF MONTANA,                                                         AUG 2 it 2021
    BOVVen   Greenwood
    Cleric of Supreme Court
    Plaintiff and Appellee,                                     State of Montana
    v.                                                            ORDER
    CAMERON MASON STONE,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Before this Court is an Opposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed by counsel for the
    State of Montana. Self-represented Appellant Cameron Mason Stone has not filed a written
    response.
    The State explains that Stone appeals a December 16, 2020 Yellowstone County
    District Court Order denying his "MOTION TO DISIVIISS WITH PREJUDICE;
    EXON[E]RATION OF UNLAWFUL CHARGES. AND IMMIEDMATE RELEASE
    FROM UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT AS A [sic] OF INVALID CHARGES AND
    SENTENCING BASED ON LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" that the
    District Court construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Emphasis in original).
    The State provides that on November 14, 2018, the District Court committed Stone to the
    Department of Corrections for a ten-year sentence with six years suspended after Stone
    pleaded guilty to felony sexual intercourse without consent. The State adds that Stone did
    not appeal nor did he seek postconviction relief. Instead, the State submits'that more than
    two years later, Stone moved the District Court for relief, including release, from prison
    and full exoneration, arguing that the court did not grant leave to file the original
    Information and was without subject matter jurisdiction. The State contends that Stone has
    no right to appeal a court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See § 46-22-
    307, MCA. The State points to this Court's earlier decisions where we dismissed appeals
    because they were improperly before this Court. State ex rel. Graveley v. Dist. Ct., 
    178 Mont. 1
    , 4-5, 
    582 P.2d 775
    , 777 (1978) and State v. Mahoney, No. DA 16-0166, Order,
    
    2016 Mont. LEXIS 1134
     (Jun. 7, 2016).
    This Court reviewed the District Court record on file here. As provided, Stone was
    sentenced in open court on November 14, 2018. Counsel for Stone moved to withdraw in
    March 2019, and the court granted the motion. On September 18, 2019, the court held a
    sentence review hearing in accordance with §§ 41-5-2501 through 41-5-2510, MCA, the
    Criminally Convicted Youth Act, because Stone was seventeen years old at the time of the
    offense. The District Court considered Stone's progress while in prison and the victim's
    opposition to a sentence modification, declining to modify the sentence previously
    imposed.     On October 16, 2020, Stone filed a "MOTION TO COIVIPEL THE
    PRODUCTION          OF    DEFENDANTS           ENTIRE      CASE      FILES,     DISCOVERY,
    TRANSCRIPTS AND ALL AND. ANY OTHER [PERTINENT] INFORMATION AND
    RECORDS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS."                            (Emphasis in original).       On
    November 19, 2020, Stone also filed the motion .at issue concerning dismissal and
    exoneration, challenging subject matter jurisdiction. The District Court deemed Stone's
    pleadings, as the State explains, a petition thr habeas 'corpus relief because Stone was
    collaterally attacking the legality of his present incarceration. The court denied his petition,
    noting that Stone had attached a copy of its Order granting leave to his brief, filed in District
    Court on November 19, 2020, and that the court "did grant leave to file the Information."
    We find the State's arguments persuasive here. "Under Montana law no appeal lies
    from the order denying a writ of habeas corpus in a proceeding criminal in nature, where
    the issue to be determined is the freedom of petitioner, or the legality of iietitioner's
    detention." Graveley, 178 Mont. at 4-5, 582 P.2d at 777 (citations omitted). This Court
    must dismiss Stone's appeal of a decision denying a petition for habeas corpus relief See
    also Thomas v. Doe, 
    2011 MT 283
    , ¶ 3, 
    362 Mont. 454
    , 
    266 P.3d 1255
    . Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED that the State's Opposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal is GRANTED
    and that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.
    2
    The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel
    of record and to Cameron Stone.
    4^-N
    DATED this Z--ti -day of August. 2021.
    Chief Justice
    / Co°
    Justices
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DA 21-0070

Filed Date: 8/24/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/24/2021