State v. Grimes ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                       No. DA 06-0421
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    
    2007 MT 90N
    STATE OF MONTANA,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.
    BURLY GRIMES,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL FROM:         District Court of the Fifth Judicial District,
    In and For the County of Jefferson, Cause No. 96-1541
    Honorable Loren Tucker, Presiding Judge
    COUNSEL OF RECORD:
    For Appellant:
    Burly Grimes, pro se, Deer Lodge, Montana
    For Respondent:
    Hon. Mike McGrath, Attorney General; Tammy K. Plubell,
    Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana
    Matthew Johnson, Jefferson County Attorney, Boulder, Montana
    Submitted on Briefs: February 27, 2007
    Decided: April 3, 2007
    Filed:
    __________________________________________
    Clerk
    Chief Justice Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court.
    ¶1     Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d)(v), Montana Supreme Court 1996 Internal
    Operating Rules, as amended in 2003, the following memorandum decision shall not be cited
    as precedent. It shall be filed as a public document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and
    its case title, Supreme Court cause number and disposition shall be included in this Court's
    quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.
    ¶2     Burly Grimes appeals from the order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, Jefferson
    County, denying his March of 2006 motion to file an out-of-time appeal or second petition
    for postconviction relief. We affirm.
    ¶3     We restate the issue as whether the District Court erred in denying Grimes’ motion.
    ¶4     We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d) of our
    1996 Internal Operating Rules, as amended in 2003, which provides for memorandum
    opinions. The issue is clearly controlled by settled Montana law.
    ¶5     Grimes was convicted of robbery, aggravated kidnapping and deliberate homicide,
    and we affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. See State v. Grimes, 
    1999 MT 145
    , 
    295 Mont. 22
    , 
    982 P.2d 1037
    . He filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief in the District
    Court on September 25, 2000, which the court dismissed as untimely and because Grimes
    had already raised the same issues on direct appeal. He did not appeal.
    ¶6     Grimes now wishes to file an out-of-time appeal of his prior petition for
    postconviction relief or, alternatively, a second petition for postconviction relief. He states
    2
    he would like to argue that an attorney gave him bad advice, constituting ineffective
    assistance of counsel, regarding the time available to file his pro se petition for
    postconviction relief, and that a mandatory minimum parole eligibility date and additional
    restrictions were improperly imposed in his sentence.
    ¶7     Section 46-21-203, MCA, provides that an appeal in a postconviction matter must be
    taken within 60 days of the entry of the order. Grimes’ petition for postconviction relief was
    denied in November of 2000, over five years before he filed his present request for
    permission to file an out-of-time appeal. It is far too late for an appeal of that matter.
    ¶8     Further, with one exception, § 46-21-102(1), MCA, requires that a petition for
    postconviction relief must be filed within one year of the date the conviction becomes final.
    Moreover, § 46-21-105(1)(a), MCA, requires that all grounds for postconviction relief must
    be raised in the original or amended petition. The only exception to § 46-21-102(1), MCA,
    allows up to one year after discovery for a person to file a claim for postconviction relief
    alleging the existence of newly-discovered evidence establishing that the petitioner did not
    engage in the criminal conduct for which he was convicted. See § 46-21-102(2), MCA.
    Grimes has not alleged the existence of any such evidence.
    ¶9     We hold the District Court did not err in denying Grimes’ motion to file an out-of-
    time appeal or second petition for postconviction relief. Affirmed.
    /S/ KARLA M. GRAY
    3
    We concur:
    /S/ BRIAN MORRIS
    /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
    /S/ JOHN WARNER
    /S/ JIM RICE
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-0421

Filed Date: 4/3/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/19/2016