Matter of A.H. ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                               NO.    94-407
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    1995
    IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL
    HEALTH OF A.H.
    Jl!N 19 1995
    Respondent and Appellant.
    APPEAL FROM:   District Court of the First Judicial District,
    In and for the County of Lewis and Clark,
    The Honorable Dorothy McCarter, Judge presiding.
    COUNSEL OF RECORD:
    For Appellant:
    Lonnie   Olson,      Allen  Smith, Jr.,                Mental
    Disabilities Board of Visitors, Montana              Advocacy
    Program, Warm Springs, Montana
    For Respondent:
    Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, Elizabeth
    L. Griffing, Assistant Attorney General, Helena,
    Montana; Mike McGrath, Lewis and Clark county
    Attorney, K. Paul Stahl, Deputy Lewis and Clark
    County Attorney, Helena, Montana
    Submitted on Briefs:   June 13, 1995
    Decided:   June 19, 1995
    Filed:
    Clerk
    Justice Fred J. Weber delivered the Opinion of the Court.
    The    appellant,    A.H.,   was detained in the Lewis and Clark
    County jail pursuant to criminal charges.               She was taken from the
    jail to St. Peter's Community Hospital on January 10, 1994.                   Nancy
    Cobble prepared a mental evaluation report on January 10, 1994, and
    requested that a petition for the civil commitment of A.H. be
    filed.        On January 10, 1994, a Petition for Involuntary Commitment
    was filed in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark
    County,        alleging     that   A.H.   was    seriously   mentally   ill     and
    requesting her commitment.            The Petition requested that the court
    find that the January 10 report prepared by Nancy Cobble was
    sufficient to meet the requirements of              § 53-21-123, MCA.
    An initial appearance was made in the First Judicial District
    Court on January 10, 1994, and the court ordered that the report
    attached to the Petition completed by Nancy Cobble was sufficient
    to meet the requirements of 5 53-21-123, MCA.                   No   professional
    person was appointed by the court at the initial appearance to
    examine A.H.
    A hearing was held before the District Court on January 11,
    1994,    at which time the District Court concluded A.H. had a mental
    disorder       of   "psychotic     episode"     and found that because of her
    current mental disorder and her recent behavior, A.H. was deprived
    of the ability to protect her life or health.                A.H. was committed
    by the District Court to the Montana State Hospital by its order of
    January 11, 1994.
    A.H. has appealed contending that she was deprived of her
    right to liberty without due process of law and that she was
    committed   to    Montana State Hospital in violation of mandatory
    statutory    safeguards.      In substance, A.H. contends that § 53-21-
    122, MCA,        requires the appointment of a professional person and
    that § 53-21-123,        MCA, provides as a mandatory requirement that
    following the initial hearing the respondent shall be examined by
    such   professional      person.    A.H. contends that these statutory
    mandates were disregarded.         The District Court failed to appoint a
    professional person and ordered that the report completed before
    the initial hearing was sufficient to meet the statutory mandate.
    The Attorney General of the State of Montana has filed a
    Notice of Concession which states that this case does involve the
    appeal of commitment of A.H. pursuant to 55 53-21-122 and 123, MCA.
    The Attorney General points out that the sole issue is whether the
    proper statutory procedures were followed.          The Attorney General
    further points out that under In re R.M. (1995), 
    52 St.Rep. 68
    , 
    889 P.2d 1201
     and In re D.H. (1995), 
    52 St.Rep. 294
    , this Court has
    rejected the same commitment procedures which were used in the
    present case.        The Attorney General therefore concedes in behalf of
    the State of Montana that the District Court decision should be
    reversed.
    This Court concludes that no further procedure is required in
    the present case.
    We hold that the District Court erred when it failed to comply
    with the specific requirements of §§ 53-21-122 and 123, MCA; and
    3
    for that reason this Court reverses the order of commitment of A.H.
    to Montana State Hospital at Warm Springs, Montana.
    Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph   3(c),   Montana Supreme Court
    1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as
    precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document
    with the Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to the
    West Publishing Company.
    Reversed.
    Justices
    /
    June 19, 1995
    CERTIFICATE On..I... *.A?
    -1 QF~vT~’
    I hereby certify that tl it: following certified order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the
    1tillowing named:
    Lotie. J. Olson
    .
    Me.ntaI Disabilities Board of Visitors
    P.O. Box 177
    Warm Springs, MT 59756
    Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek
    Attome! f General
    - -
    _. .
    Justice blag.
    Helena, MT 59620
    Mike McGrath
    County Attorney
    L & C County Courthouse
    Helena, MT 59624
    ED S: ----
    MITH
    CLE& LK OF THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF MONTANA
    I-.                            -
    Deputy
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-407

Filed Date: 6/15/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014