State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •                                    No. 14328
    IN THE SUPREME c      m   OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    1978
    STATE ex rel., RIcHAFCl K. JENNXS,
    Relator,
    THE DISTRICT COUET OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL
    DISTRICT e t al.,
    Respondents.
    Counsel o f Record:
    For Relator:
    Jack Scanlon argued, Anaconda, Montana
    For Respondents:
    Knight, Dahocd, mckay a d IWLean, Anaconda, Montana
    Conde Mackay argued, Anaconda, Wntana
    Suhnitted:   July 21, 1978
    j.
    Filed: &&    -
    -Y   w
    Mr.    J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of
    t h e Court.
    Relator, ~ i c h a r dK. J e n n i n g s , h a s a p p l i e d t o t h i s C o u r t
    f o r a w r i t of supervisory c o n t r o l t o be d i r e c t e d t o t h e D i s -
    t r i c t C o u r t of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Deer Lodge
    County, and t o Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd and Honorable Arnold
    Olsen.        The a p p l i c a t i o n c o n c e r n s j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c h i l d
    c u s t o d y p r o c e e d i n g s i n i t i a t e d i n Montana by r e l a t o r ' s former
    w i f e , Sandra J e n n i n g s , a s a r e s p o n s e t o s i m i l a r p r o c e e d i n g s
    b r o u g h t by r e l a t o r i n Iowa.
    R i c h a r d and Sandra J e n n i n g s were m a r r i e d i n Iowa on
    J u l y 2 5 , 1976.         I t w a s Sandra J e n n i n g s '        second m a r r i a g e .
    Some two months l a t e r , t h e y were s e p a r a t e d .                 The husband, as
    p e t i t i o n e r , was g r a n t e d a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n of m a r r i a g e
    o n F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 1977, t h r e e d a y s a f t e r t h e b i r t h of t h e
    c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . The d e c r e e awarded c u s t o d y of t h e c h i l d
    t o t h e wife.         A t that time,           s h e a l s o had c u s t o d y o f h e r s o n
    under a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n from h e r p r e v i o u s m a r r i a g e .
    During t h e e n s u i n g months, a number o f problems a r o s e
    w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e h u s b a n d ' s v i s i t a t i o n r i g h t s and t h e
    p a r t i e s r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t on two o c c a s i o n s f o r
    f u r t h e r c l a r i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e r i g h t s .    On October 3 , 1977,
    t h e w i f e moved t o Anaconda, Nontana, t o e s c a p e what s h e h a s
    termed t h e h u s b a n d ' s " a b u s e and h a r a s s m e n t " .         After she
    moved, t h e husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t and r e c e i v e d
    a n o r d e r t e r m i n a t i n g h i s c h i l d s u p p o r t payments and g r a n t i n g
    him c u s t o d y of t h e c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r .         A short t i m e later,
    t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t from h i s
    home i n Nebraska and r e c e i v e d a s i m i l a r o r d e r w i t h r e s p e c t
    t o t h e c h i l d of t h e w i f e ' s m a r r i a g e t o him.            The w i f e d i d
    n o t a t t e n d e i t h e r of t h e s e hearings.
    On ~ p r i 21, 1978, r e l a t o r f i l e d t h e Iowa o r d e r modi-
    l
    f y i n g c u s t o d y w i t h t h e C l e r k of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t , Deer
    Lodge County, Montana, s o t h a t i t m i g h t b e e n f o r c e d i n t h i s
    s t a t e p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 61-416,       R.C.M.    1947 (Supp. 1 9 7 7 ) .
    On t h e h u s b a n d ' s m o t i o n , t h e Honorable Arnold O l s e n , s i t t i n g
    i n t h e a b s e n c e of Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd, i s s u e d a n o r d e r
    g i v i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t t o t h e Iowa p r o c e e d i n g s and
    d i r e c t i n g t h e w i f e t o s u r r e n d e r c u s t o d y of t h e d a u g h t e r t o
    t h e husband.          The w i f e w a s never s e r v e d w i t h t h i s o r d e r .
    On May 3 , 1978, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t
    f o r a h e a r i n g c h a l l e n g i n g t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e Iowa
    d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o modify t h e d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n as t o
    custody.         T h a t s a m e d a y , Judge O l s e n a g a i n o r d e r e d t h e w i f e
    t o r e l i n q u i s h c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r .   However, Judge Boyd,
    having r e t u r n e d t o t h e bench, i s s u e d a temporary r e s t r a i n i n g
    o r d e r p r o h i b i t i n g t h e husband from t a k i n g c u s t o d y of t h e
    daughter u n t i l a hearing could be held concerning t h e matter.
    On May 9, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e c o u r t t o modify t h e Iowa
    d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n and r e t u r n l e g a l c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r
    t o her.       T h a t same d a y , c o u n s e l f o r r e l a t o r f i l e d a motion
    s e e k i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t f o r t h e Iowa o r d e r o b t a i n e d by
    t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e w i f e ' s son.
    The f i r s t husband l a t e r o b t a i n e d c u s t o d y of t h e s o n t h r o u g h
    habeas c o r p u s p r o c e e d i n g s i n t h e S t a t e of Washington where
    t h e w i f e had t a k e n t h e s o n f o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t .
    On May 30, r e l a t o r moved t h a t t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g
    o r d e r b e quashed, t h e p e t i t i o n f o r m o d i f i c a t i o n d i s m i s s e d ,
    and t h e A p r i l 21 o r d e r e n f o r c e d .       Judge Boyd d e n i e d t h e
    h u s b a n d ' s motion and o r d e r e d him t o s e e k a w r i t o f s u p e r -
    v i s o r y c o n t r o l i n t h i s C o u r t t o d e t e r m i n e t h e q u e s t i o n of
    jurisdiction.            W e hold t h a t supervisory c o n t r o l i s n o t a
    n e c e s s a r y remedy under t h e s e f a c t s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l i e f
    s o u g h t by r e l a t o r .
    T h i s C o u r t , i n S t a t e e x r e l . Woodahl v . D i s t r i c t C o u r t
    ( 1 9 7 5 ) , 
    166 Mont. 31
    , 38, 
    530 P.2d 780
    , 785, h e l d :
    " * * * when t h e f a c t s c l e a r l y show t h a t a p a r t y
    h a s no p l a i n , speedy o r a d e q u a t e remedy a t law,
    and when t h e r e i s no r i g h t of a p p e a l from a
    d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s o r d e r , a w r i t of s u p e r v i s o r y
    c o n t r o l may i s s u e s o t h a t t h e d e c i s i o n of t h e
    lower c o u r t may b e reviewed by t h e Montana
    Supreme C o u r t "      .
    F u r t h e r , t h i s C o u r t , i n P e t i t i o n of C h a r l e s Waite, Jr.
    ( 1 9 6 4 ) , 
    143 Mont. 321
    , 322, 
    389 P.2d 407
    , 408, s t a t e d :
    " I t i s incumbent f u r t h e r upon p e t i t i o n e r s
    seeking o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h i s c o u r t
    t o make a showing of t h e inadequacy o r u n a v a i l -
    a b i l i t y of any o t h e r remedy, e i t h e r i n t h e
    d i s t r i c t c o u r t o r by way of a p p e a l t o t h i s
    court "  .
    R e l a t o r h a s a p l a i n and speedy remedy a t law a v a i l a b l e
    t o him by a p p e a l from any a c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t .
    T h e r e f o r e , t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e l a t o r i s d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t
    p r e j u d i c e and t h i s matter i s remanded t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t
    of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t f o r s u c h f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s
    a s i t may deem a p p r o p r i a t e .
    W e Concur:
    %,-Jw
    WdWeq
    Chief J u s t i c e
    .-
    -
    .,>v,%"-         6,    +<&I?)
    , / Justices
    L'
    L/
    0
    I N T E SUPREME COURT O THE STATE O MONTANA
    H                 F           F
    No. 14328
    STATE e x r e l . ,    RICHARD K.       JENNINGS,
    Relator,
    THE DISTRICT COURT O T E T H I R D
    F H
    J U D I C I A L DISTRICT, e t a l . ,
    Respondents.
    O R D E R
    Through i n a d v e r t e n c e , t h e Opinion i n t h e above e n t i t l e d
    c a u s e w a s s i g n e d by J u s t i c e Gene B.   Daly i n s t e a d of t h e
    Honorable P e t e r G. Meloy, D i s t r i c t J u d g e , s i t t i n g f o r J u s t i c e
    Daly   .
    W e hereby i s s u e a c o r r e c t i o n o r d e r s u b s t i t u t i n g Judge
    Meloy f o r J u s t i c e Daly.
    D T D this
    AE             l s d - , day   of September, 1978.
    s - , a p 4 % 4
    #Chief     Justice
    t r i c t J u d g e , concu
    J
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14328

Filed Date: 8/21/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014