Lopez v. Musselshell County , 2000 MT 101N-A ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •  file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-476%20Order.htm
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    2000 MT 101N-A
    No. 99-476
    _________________
    AMADO GERRY LOPEZ,
    Plaintiff and Appellant,
    v. O R D E R
    MUSSELSHELL COUNTY; MUSSELSHELL COUNTY
    SHERIFF, G. PAUL SMITH, individually and in his official
    capacity; MUSSELSHELL COUNTY ATTORNEY JOHN
    BOHLMAN, individually and in his official capacity; and)
    MUSSELSHELL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES ORVILLE
    "BUZZ" JONES; "DUTCH" VAN SYCKEL; WANDA
    SPAULDING; and WOODROW "WOODY" WEITZEIL,
    individually and in their official capacities,
    Defendants and Respondents.
    _________________
    On April 20, 2000, the Court issued its Opinion in the above-entitled matter. On May 5,
    2000, Appellant Amado Gerry Lopez, filed herein a Petition for Rehearing and
    Memorandum in Support. Respondents' opposition to Appellant's Petition for Rehearing
    was filed May 8, 2000. The Court having considered the Petition and Response,
    file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-476%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/28/2007 11:40:11 AM
    file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-476%20Order.htm
    IT IS ORDERED that the statutory reference in ¶ 58 is hereby changed to reflect the
    correct statute. Specifically, ¶ 58 of this Court's April 20, 2000, Opinion should read as
    follows:
    ¶58 Lopez contends that the defendants defended against the claims of six plaintiffs in this
    case and that the case was intertwined with a related action by Trochmann. We need not
    address Lopez's contention, however, because the record is clear that his objections to
    costs were not timely filed under § 25-10-502, MCA. Accordingly, Lopez waived his right
    to object to the defendants' claimed costs.
    IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, this Court's Opinion of April 20,
    2000, shall remain the same and the Petition for Rehearing is denied. Let remittitur issue
    forthwith.
    The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a true and correct copy of this order to all counsel of
    record.
    DATED this 23rd day of May 2000.
    /S/ KARLA M. GRAY
    /S/ JIM REGNIER
    /S/ JAMES C. NELSON
    /S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
    file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-476%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/28/2007 11:40:11 AM
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-476

Citation Numbers: 2000 MT 101N-A

Filed Date: 5/23/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/28/2017