State v. Shannon ( 1992 )


Menu:
  •                               NO.    91-299
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    1992
    STATE OF MONTANA,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    -vs-
    LANCE THOMAS SHANNON,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL FROM:    District Court of the Eighth Judicial District,
    In and for the county of Cascade,
    The Honorable Joel Roth, Judge presiding.
    COUNSEL OF RECORD:
    For Appellant:
    June Lord, Attorney at Law, Great Falls, Montana.
    For Respondent:
    Marc Racicot, Attorney General, Carol E. Schmidt,
    Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana
    Patrick L. Paul, Cascade County Attorney, Great
    Falls, Montana.
    Submitted on Briefs:       December 19, 1991
    Decided:   January 14, 1992
    Filed:
    Clerk
    Justice Karla M. Gray delivered the Opinion of the Court.
    The defendant, Lance Thomas Shannon, appeals from a Judgment
    of Conviction and Sentencing Order of the District Court for the
    Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County.     We affirm.
    The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court abused
    its discretion in denying Shannon's motion to withdraw a guilty
    plea.
    The defendant was charged with felony theft pursuant to   § 45-
    6-301(l)(a), MCA, on March 16, 1990.      On March 27, 1990, Shannon
    pled not guilty to the offense. Subsequently, a plea agreement was
    entered into in which Shannon agreed to plead guilty and the County
    Attorney agreed to recommend that Shannon receive a deferred
    sentence and pay restitution of monies.
    Following the plea agreement, but before sentencing, Shannon
    moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis of his
    discovery of evidence corroborating h i s innocence.       The District
    Court heard oral arguments on Shannon's motion and, on February 26,
    1991, denied that motion. The defendant was sentenced on March 15,
    1991.
    The defendant was hired as a manager of the Wild Rose Casino
    in Great Falls in June of 1989.        From about October 1, 1989,
    through January 20, 1990, Shannon wrote a series of eleven checks
    totalling over $2,000 on the casino's business account with himself
    as payee.      The account ledger shows that the checks had been
    written to vendors.     The owner of the casino eventually discovered
    2
    the discrepancies, and this action ensued.
    The defendant claimed that the checks written to himself were
    in recompense for repair work he had done for his employer's
    business.     He sought to withdraw his guilty plea because he
    discovered that one of the vendors had receipts which would confirm
    this claim.
    The court concluded that the "new evidence" was not unknown to
    Shannon when he pled guilty in August of 1990. Further, the court
    determined that the evidence asserted as new by Shannon had no
    bearing on the defendant's testimony at the hearing which resulted
    in the entry of his guilty plea.
    Defendant contends that withdrawal of guilty plea can be
    premised upon some mistake or misapprehension and that he was under
    the misapprehension that no evidence existed to support his
    contentions.    Therefore, he asserts that the court abused its
    discretion in denying his motion.
    It is true that certain mistakes or misapprehensions can
    provide an appropriate basis for withdrawal of a guilty plea.
    However, the District Court correctly determined that withdrawal of
    a plea premised on a mistake or misapprehension must relate to the
    consequences of the plea itself and not to an analysis of the
    evidence in the case.   State v. Milinovich (Mont. 1991), 
    812 P.2d 338
    , 4 8 St.Rep. 470.   The court did not abuse its discretion in
    denying Shannon's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
    Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court
    1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as
    precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document
    with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result
    to Montana Law Week, State Reporter and West Publishing Company.
    Af finned.
    We concur:
    4
    January 14, 1992
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that the following order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the
    following named:
    June Lord
    Attorney at Law
    600 Central Plaza, No. 400
    Great Falls, MT 59401
    Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General
    , Assistant Attorney General
    Justice Building
    Helena, MT 59620
    Patrick L. Paul, Cascade County Attorney
    J. Kim Schulke, Deputy County Attorney
    Cascade County Courthouse
    Great Falls, MT 59401
    ED SMITH
    CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF MONTANA
    B
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 91-299

Filed Date: 1/14/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014