Blackcrow v. Salmonsen ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •       ORIGINAL                                                                             06/21/2022
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                              Case Number: OP 22-0291
    OP 22-0291
    ALOYSIUS DENNIS BLACKCROW,
    JUN 2 1 2022
    Greenwood
    Petitioner,                                                BOVVerl
    Clerk of
    Supreme Cowl
    Montana
    State of
    v.
    ORDER
    JAMES SALMONSEN, Warden,
    Montana State Prison,
    Respondent.
    Aloysius Dennis Blackcrow petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief and
    includes several attachrnents. He asserts that an irnproper parole revocation occurred,
    "without strict adherence to outlined Montana statutes." He has since filed a supporting
    affidavit.
    Blackcrow explains that on June 18, 2021, his parole officer issued an arrest
    warrant, following Blackcrow's involvement in a single vehicle accident where alcohol
    and illegal drugs were found in the vehicle. Blackcrow states that he was arrested on July
    7, 2021, for felony criminal possession of dangerous drugs and felony theft. Blackcrow
    states that bail was set at $25,000 and that he had a preliminary hearing set for July 19,
    2021. Blackcrow provides that on February 17, 2022, the Lake County District Court held
    a hearing on his counsel's motion to dismiss, alleging a violation of § 46-10-105, MCA.
    Blackcrow includes a copy of the court's order, dismissing his underlying criminal case
    because no preliminary hearing was held.
    Blackcrow now requests reinstatement of his parole. Blackcrow contends that his
    parole was improperly revoked because "the Lake County Probation and Parole Office did
    not adhere to the strict outlined Montana statutes." Blackcrow points out that he was held
    on two arrest warrants without any probable cause determination. He argues that he was
    in the Lake County Jail for eight months and at no tirne did he have an initial hearing
    concerning his parole status or alleged violations. Blackcrow states that it was not until
    February 22, 2022, after his charges were disrnissed, that he had the on-site hearing to
    determine probable cause. He argues that this flies in the face of the required 72 hours,
    pursuant to § 46-23-1023(4), MCA. He contends that his parole officer and the Lake
    County Attorney lied under oath during his court proceeding. He also puts forth that his
    violations were "exaggerated" or "inflated" as an act of reprisal.
    Blackcrow tries to argue that dismissal of his underlying criminal case and the
    failure to have a timely initial hearing concerning his alleged parole violations have
    prejudiced him. Under Montana law, when a parolee commits a new offense, the parolee
    is not entitled to an initial hearing within 72 hours or five days of arrest.
    See §§ 46-23-1023(4), MCA, -1024(2), MCA. Section 46-23-1023(3), MCA, concerning
    arrest of an alleged parole violator, provides that "[p]ending a hearing, as provided in
    46-23-1024 and 46-23-1025, upon any charge of violation the parolee may, if
    circumstances warrant, be incarcerated in the institution." (Emphasis in original). Pursuant
    to Montana statutes, while not in prison, Blackcrow was held or detained in jail "upon any
    charge of violation . . . ." Section 46-23-1023(4), MCA. Blackcrow has not advanced any
    law to support a claim of prejudice.
    Blackcrow has not dernonstrated illegal incarceration necessaiy for the remedy of
    habeas corpus relief. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. In 2021, as a parolee, new criminal
    charges were filed against him. Blackcrow was not entitled to an on-site, initial hearing to
    determine probable cause, pursuant to § 46-23-1024(1)(b), MCA, as the District Court
    correctly pointed out in its dismissal order. While Blackcrow's hearing was delayed by his
    criminal case, he has not shown any prejudice because Blackcrow received relief in the
    District Court. Even though the court dismissed the criminal case, reasons existed for the
    Board to revoke parole.
    Blackcrow's attached Report of Violation speaks for itself. Blackcrow was paroled
    on June 23, 2020, and he was cornplying until October 2020. In October 2020, Blackcrow
    tested positive for methamphetamine, and his parole officer increased reporting
    requirements as well as increased urine analysis tests for alcohol and drugs. The Report
    2
    outlines his increased drug and alcohol use as well as his inability to abide by parole
    conditions. The Report contains five violations, including the two dismissed felonies, and
    recommends parole revocation because he "is a danger to the community, and unable to
    abide by the laws, he creates more victims, and is not appropriate for community
    supervision."
    Blackcrow attaches copies of his grievances to the Board of Pardons and Parole
    (Board) concerning an appeal or reconsideration of his parole revocation. We have stated
    before that the Board has broad statutory authority to consider even dismissed criminal
    counts along with other evidence. McDermott v. McDonald, 
    2001 MT 89
    , ¶¶ 20-21, 
    305 Mont. 166
    , 
    24 P.3d 200
    .      The Board denied his request for reconsideration twice,
    explaining that evidence is required for reconsideration. The Board also stated that:
    Blackcrow has "not shown the [Board] relied on false information to revoke [his] parole."
    The Board's written responses support this conclusion of parole revocation.
    Blackcrow is not entitled to reinstatement of parole. Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED that Blackcrow's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED
    and DISMISSED.
    The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to
    Aloysius D. Blackcrow personally.
    DATED this E L day of June, 2022.
    Chief Justice
    e C11 'frn 4              4,
    Justices
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: OP 22-0291

Filed Date: 6/21/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2022