Mccann v. State ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                       ORIGINAL                                              09/27/2022
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    Case Number: OP 22-0506
    OP 22-0506
    ANTONIO S. MCCANN,
    SEP 2 7 2022
    Bowen Greenwood
    Petitioner,                                           Clerk of Supreme Court
    State of IViontana
    v.
    ORDER
    BRIAN GOOTKIN, DIRECTOR, and
    JIM SALMONSEN, WARDEN,
    Respondents.
    Antonio S. McCann has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or alternatively, a
    Writ of Prohibition, requesting a writ against the Director of the Department of Corrections
    (DOC) and the Warden of the Montana State Prison (MSP) after a decision from the
    Sentence Review Division (Division). He includes a copy of the decision.
    A writ of mandamus, or mandate, is provided by statute. Sections 27-26-101
    through 27-26-403, MCA. To state a claim for mandamus, a party must show entitlement
    to the performance of a clear legal duty by the party against whom the writ is directed and
    the absence of a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. Section 27-26-102, MCA;
    Smith v. Missoula Co., 
    1999 MT 330
    , ¶ 28, 
    297 Mont. 368
    , 
    992 P.2d 834
    .
    McCann argues the DOC and MSP have a clear legal duty to release him and follow
    the Division's decision. McCann contends that he is being held "without any active
    sentence" because the DOC and MSP have not acted on his decreased sentence as stated in
    the Division's August 9, 2022 decision. He asserts that the DOC and MSP have refused
    "to honor this Honorable Court's Order."
    McCann is mistaken. The DOC and MSP may only release him after receipt of a
    revised sentencing judgment. After the Division issues a decision that orders a different
    sentence, "the court sitting in any convenient county shall resentence the person as ordered
    by the review division." Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. Furthermore, according to available
    electronic records, McCann was released to probation on September 21, 2022.
    McCann has not demonstrated a clear legal duty, pursuant to § 27-26-102, MCA,
    for such a writ to issue. Therefore,
    IT IS ORDERED that McCann's Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or alternatively, a
    writ of prohibition, is DENIED and DISMISSED.
    DATED this Ci• day of September, 2022.
    Chief Justice
    LA6/2
    Justices
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: OP 22-0506

Filed Date: 9/27/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/27/2022