M. WHITEMAN v. J. Valdez ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                              10/04/2022
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                                 Case Number: OP 22-0520
    OP 22-0520
    MAYNARD WHITEMAN,
    OCT 0 4 2022
    Petitioner,                                                  Bovv<, n Gieenwood
    Clerk of Supreme
    Court
    State of Montana
    v.
    ORDER
    JASON VALDEZ, Yellowstone County
    Detention Facility,
    Respondent.
    Maynard Whiteman petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief, indicating that his
    incarceration is illegal because he has been denied due process and because he has not
    signed a waiver of a speedy trial. He states that he has been in the Yellowstone County
    Detention Center for more than nine months and that he has not had any visits from his
    public defender. Whiteman states he is not a drug dealer and that before all of this, he was
    in college and working because he changed his life. He further states that he "feel[s] like
    the County is just trying to get a conviction because [he] was on parole [and] [he's] a Native
    American." He requests dismissal of his case.
    Available electronic records indicate that the Board of Pardons and Parole granted
    Whiteman parole in May 2021 and that he was arrested in December 2021 for various
    reports of violations. In a prior Order, this Court explained to Whiteman that the cause of
    his restraint was due to his arrest for new offenses while he was a parolee. See Whiteman
    v. Valdez, No. OP 22-0439, Order denying habeas corpus relief (Mont. Aug. 30, 2022).
    We secured a copy of the District Court's docket sheet. Whiteman has counsel to
    represent him, and the court has continued his jury trial at least twice. On September 13,
    2022, the court held a trial status hearing. The court re-scheduled the jury trial for
    November 22, 2022.
    Whiteman raises claims that are not addressable or capable of review in a petition
    for habeas corpus relief. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. While he alleges that his restraint
    or incarceration is illegal, habeas corpus is not the remedy for his constitutional claims
    concerning due process or speedy trial. Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Comm'rs, 
    235 Mont. 261
    ,
    262, 
    766 P.2d 884
    , 884-85 (1988).
    Further, Whiteman should refrain from filing pleadings on his own behalf with this
    Court while he is represented by counsel in the District Court. M. R. App. P. 10(1)(c).
    Therefore,
    IT IS ORDERED that Whiteman's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED
    and DISMISSED .
    The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the Honorable Jessica Fehr;
    District Court Judge; Terry Halpin, Clerk of District Court, under Cause Nos. DC 14-454,
    DC 17-24, and DC 21-1569; Benjamin Langford, Deputy County Attorney; Blaine
    McGivern, Defense Counsel; and Maynard Whiteman, personally.
    DATED this 1-141-ll'hay of October, 2022.
    Chief Justice
    ?(4 - 4 it,
    Justices
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: OP 22-0520

Filed Date: 10/4/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/4/2022