Marriage of Kelly and Camp ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                              10/20/2020
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                                Case Number: DA 20-0449
    DA 20-0449
    FILED
    IN RE MARRIAGE OF
    OCT 2 0 2020
    BRIDGET J. KELLY.                                                Bowen Greenw000
    Clerk of Suprerne Cour
    State of Montana
    Petitioner and Appellee,
    ORDER
    v.
    JOSEPH S. CAMP,III,
    Respondent and Appellant.
    By motion filed September 28, 2020, Appellee Bridget J. Kelly moves this Court
    pursuant to M.R. App.P.6(5)(0 and(6)to dismiss the appeal ofAppellee Joseph S. Camp,
    III, filed on September 14, 2020, on the asserted ground that the appeal is premature
    because the underlying District Court judgment is not a final judgment due to the
    outstanding pendency of an attorney fees award. Appellee asserts that the subject District
    Court judgment included an attorney fees award in an amount yet to be determined upon
    the record of a hearing scheduled for October 14, 2020. Appellant opposes the motion on
    the asserted grounds that, although the amount of the included attorney fees award has yet
    to be determined, the award is not "necessary" as referenced in M. R. App. P. 4(1)(a)
    because the District Court has since vacated the previously scheduled October 14 attorney
    fees hearing on the stated ground that filing of Appellant's notice of appeal deprived the
    court of"the authority to address the pending dispute regarding attorney fees and costs."
    Except under certain circurnstances not presented here, a party may appeal only
    from a "final judgment." M. R. App. P. 6(1). A "final judgmenr is a judgment that
    "conclusively determines the rights ofthe parties and settles all claims in controversy in an
    action or proceeding, including any necessary determination ofthe amount ofcosts and
    attorneyfees awarded" therein. M. R. App. P. 4(1)(a)(emphasis added). The premature
    filing of a notice of appeal prior to determination of the amount of costs and attorney fees
    awarded in an otherwise final judgment does not deprive the District Court of authority to
    proceed to that determination. In re Marriage ofMarez & Marshall, 
    2014 MT 333
    , ¶ 40,
    
    377 Mont. 304
    ,
    340 P.3d 520
    . See also M. R. App. P. 5(a)(ii)("premature filing ofa notice
    of appeal" does not deprive court of -jurisdiction to enter the written judgment"). Here,
    pursuant to M. R. App. P. 4(1)(a), the subject judgment will not be final until the District
    Court determines and cnters judgment on the included award of attorney fees and costs.
    Appellant prematurely filed a notice of appeal and the District Court thus erroneously
    concluded that it deprived the court ofjurisdiction to determine the amount ofthe included
    award of attorney fees and costs.
    THEREFORE,
    IT IS ORDERED that Appellee's "Motion to Dismiss" this premature appeal,
    instituted by notice filed September 14, 2020, is hereby GRANTED.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant's Appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT
    PREJUDICE.
    The Clerk is directed to give notice of this Order to all counsel ofrecord.
    Dated this 20th day of October, 2020.
    Chief Justice
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DA 20-0449

Filed Date: 10/20/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/20/2020