K. Franks v. State ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                            04/11/2023
    DA 22-0575
    Case Number: DA 22-0575
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    
    2023 MT 65N
    KELLY FRANK,
    Petitioner and Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MONTANA,
    Respondent and Appellee.
    APPEAL FROM:          District Court of the Ninth Judicial District,
    In and For the County of Teton, Cause No. DC 05-007
    Honorable Robert G. Olson, Presiding Judge
    COUNSEL OF RECORD:
    For Appellant:
    Kelly Frank, Self-Represented, Helena, Montana
    For Appellee:
    Austin Knudsen, Montana Attorney General, Bjorn Boyer, Assistant
    Attorney General, Helena, Montana
    Joe W. Coble, Teton County Attorney, Choteau, Montana
    Submitted on Briefs: March 8, 2023
    Decided: April 11, 2023
    Filed:
    ir,-6m---if
    __________________________________________
    Clerk
    Chief Justice Mike McGrath delivered the Opinion of the Court.
    ¶1    Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating
    Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not
    serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this
    Court’s quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana
    Reports.
    ¶2    Kelly Frank (Frank) appeals from an Order Denying Motion in the Nature of Writ
    of Error Coram Nobis issued by the Ninth Judicial District Court on September 14, 2022.
    We affirm.
    ¶3    On March 21, 2005, an Information was filed in the District Court charging Frank
    with single counts of the following offenses: Solicitation, in violation of § 45-4-101, MCA
    (2003); Theft, in violation of § 45-6-301(2), MCA (2003); and, Obstructing a Peace
    Officer, in violation of § 45-7-302, MCA (2003). On April 15, 2005, an Amended
    Information was filed charging Frank with the following offenses: two counts of
    Solicitation, in violation of § 45-4-101, MCA (2003); one count of Theft of Property by
    Embezzlement, in violation of § 45-6-301(7), MCA (2003); and, one count of Obstructing
    a Peace Officer, in violation of § 45-7-302, MCA (2003). On July 11, 2005, an Information
    was filed charging Frank with a single count of Felony Possession of Wildlife, in violation
    of §§ 87-3-118 and 87-1-115, MCA (2003).
    ¶4    On July 11, 2005, a plea agreement was filed with the District Court in which Frank
    agreed to plead guilty to Theft of Property by Embezzlement, Obstruction of a Peace
    2
    Officer, and Felony Possession of Wildlife. On the same day, Frank appeared with his
    counsel of record and changed his plea in accordance with the plea agreement. The State
    dismissed the two counts of Solicitation as part of that agreement.
    ¶5     On September 14, 2005, the District Court sentenced Frank to a ten-year
    commitment in the Montana State Prison for Theft of Property by Embezzlement, to a
    six-month commitment in the Teton County Jail for Obstructing a Peace Officer—to run
    concurrently with the sentence for Theft of Property Embezzlement, and to a five-year
    commitment in the Montana State Prison for Felony Possession of Wildlife—to run
    concurrently with Frank’s two other commitments. Frank did not appeal this sentence.
    ¶6     On August 17, 2022, Frank filed a Motion in the Nature of Writ Error Coram Nobis
    Including Brief (Motion) in the District Court. The court declined to hold a hearing.
    ¶7     On September 14, 2022, the District Court issued an Order Denying Motion in the
    Nature of Writ of Error of Coram Nobis. The court considered the Motion as a petition for
    postconviction relief, pursuant to § 46-21-102, MCA, because Montana courts have not
    considered petitions for coram nobis since October 1, 2011. Petitions for postconviction
    relief must be filed within a year of the date a conviction becomes final. Section 46-21-102,
    MCA. Frank’s petition was filed nearly seventeen years after his conviction was made
    final. The court consequently denied his petition as untimely.
    ¶8     The District Court did not find cause pursuant to the exceptions under
    § 46-21-102(2), MCA, to exempt Frank’s petition from the statutory deadline. The court
    reasoned that Frank did not assert any allegations nor cite any facts to justify such an
    exception. The court also pointed out that while under oath Frank admitted his guilt to
    3
    Theft of Property Embezzlement in open court and that Frank agreed to a beneficial plea
    agreement that confirmed his guilty plea.
    ¶9     We review a district court’s denial of postconviction relief to determine if the court’s
    findings of fact are clearly erroneous, and if its conclusions of law are correct. Kenfield v.
    State, 
    2016 MT 197
    , ¶ 7, 
    384 Mont. 322
    , 
    377 P.3d 1207
    .
    ¶10    A writ of coram nobis is not available as a remedy for postconviction relief. State
    v. Barrack, 
    267 Mont. 154
    , 159, 
    882 P.2d 1028
    , 1031 (1994). The writ of coram nobis was
    incorporated into § 46-21-101(1), MCA, which details petitions for postconviction relief,
    in 1997. 1997 Mont. Laws ch. 378, § 3. This Court abolished the writ of coram nobis,
    effective October 1, 2011, upon revising the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure.
    ¶11    The District Court conducted a thorough analysis of the applicable laws and
    correctly concluded that Frank’s petition was time-barred pursuant to § 46-21-102, MCA.
    ¶12    We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c) of our
    Internal Operating Rules, which provides for memorandum opinions. In the opinion of the
    Court, the case presents a question controlled by settled law or by the clear application of
    applicable standards of review.
    ¶13    Affirmed.
    /S/ MIKE McGRATH
    We Concur:
    /S/ JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA
    /S/ BETH BAKER
    /S/ INGRID GUSTAFSON
    /S/ JIM RICE
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DA 22-0575

Filed Date: 4/11/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/11/2023