James Dodrill v. Office of Personnel Management ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
    JAMES PAUL DODRILL,                           DOCKET NUMBER
    Appellant,                       DC-300A-18-0663-I-1
    v.
    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL                           DATE: February 21, 2024
    MANAGEMENT,
    Agency.
    James Paul Dodrill , Zion Crossroads, Virginia, pro se.
    Katherine Brewer , Washington, D.C., for the agency.
    BEFORE
    Cathy A. Harris, Vice Chairman
    ORDER
    The appellant has filed a petition for review of the initial decision, which
    dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Member Limon has recused himself
    from consideration of this case.     Because there is no quorum to alter the
    administrative judge’s initial decision, the initial decision now becomes the final
    decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the
    Code of Federal Regulations, section 1200.3(b) (
    5 C.F.R. § 1200.3
    (b)).        This
    decision shall not be considered as precedent by the Board in any other case.
    
    5 C.F.R. § 1200.3
    (d).
    2
    NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS 1
    You may obtain review of the final decision. 
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (a)(1). By
    statute, the nature of your claims determines the time limit for seeking such
    review and the appropriate forum with which to file.               
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b).
    Although we offer the following summary of available appeal rights, the Merit
    Systems Protection Board does not provide legal advice on which option is most
    appropriate for your situation and the rights described below do not represent a
    statement of how courts will rule regarding which cases fall within their
    jurisdiction.   If you wish to seek review of the final decision, you should
    immediately review the law applicable to your claims and carefully follow all
    filing time limits and requirements. Failure to file within the applicable time
    limit may result in the dismissal of your case by your chosen forum.
    Please read carefully each of the three main possible choices of review
    below to decide which one applies to your particular case. If you have questions
    about whether a particular forum is the appropriate one to review your case, you
    should contact that forum for more information.
    (1) Judicial review in general . As a general rule, an appellant seeking
    judicial review of a final Board order must file a petition for review with the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which must be received by the court
    within 60 calendar days of the date of issuance of this order. 
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b)
    (1)(A).
    If you submit a petition for review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
    Federal   Circuit,   you    must   submit   your   petition   to    the   court   at   the
    following address:
    1
    Since the issuance of the initial decision in this matter, the Board may have updated
    the notice of review rights included in final decisions. As indicated in the notice, the
    Board cannot advise which option is most appropriate in any matter.
    3
    U.S. Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    717 Madison Place, N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20439
    Additional information about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
    Circuit is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular
    relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is
    contained within the court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, 10, and 11.
    If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at
    http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation
    for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The
    Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that
    any attorney will accept representation in a given case.
    (2) Judicial   or   EEOC     review    of   cases    involving   a   claim   of
    discrimination . This option applies to you only if you have claimed that you
    were affected by an action that is appealable to the Board and that such action
    was based, in whole or in part, on unlawful discrimination. If so, you may obtain
    judicial review of the final decision—including a disposition of your
    discrimination claims —by filing a civil action with an appropriate U.S. district
    court (not the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar
    days after you receive this order.     
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b)(2); see Perry v. Merit
    Systems Protection Board, 
    582 U.S. 420
     (2017). If you have a representative in
    this case, and your representative receives this order before you do, then you must
    file with the district court no later than 30 calendar days after your
    representative receives this order. If the action involves a claim of discrimination
    based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or a disabling condition, you
    may be entitled to representation by a court-appointed lawyer and to waiver of
    4
    any requirement of prepayment of fees, costs, or other security. See 42 U.S.C.
    § 2000e-5(f) and 29 U.S.C. § 794a.
    Contact information for U.S. district courts can be found at their respective
    websites, which can be accessed through the link below:
    http://www.uscourts.gov/Court_Locator/CourtWebsites.aspx .
    Alternatively, you may request review by the Equal Employment
    Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of your discrimination claims only, excluding
    all other issues . 
    5 U.S.C. § 7702
    (b)(1). You must file any such request with the
    EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations within 30 calendar days after you receive
    this order. 
    5 U.S.C. § 7702
    (b)(1). If you have a representative in this case, and
    your representative receives this order before you do, then you must file with the
    EEOC no later than 30 calendar days after your representative receives
    this order.
    If you submit a request for review to the EEOC by regular U.S. mail, the
    address of the EEOC is:
    Office of Federal Operations
    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    P.O. Box 77960
    Washington, D.C. 20013
    If you submit a request for review to the EEOC via commercial delivery or
    by a method requiring a signature, it must be addressed to:
    Office of Federal Operations
    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    131 M Street, N.E.
    Suite 5SW12G
    Washington, D.C. 20507
    (3) Judicial     review   pursuant   to   the   Whistleblower     Protection
    Enhancement Act of 2012 . This option applies to you only if you have raised
    claims of reprisal for whistleblowing disclosures under 
    5 U.S.C. § 2302
    (b)(8) or
    other protected activities listed in 
    5 U.S.C. § 2302
    (b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D).
    If so, and your judicial petition for review “raises no challenge to the Board’s
    5
    disposition of allegations of a prohibited personnel practice described in section
    2302(b) other than practices described in section 2302(b)(8), or 2302(b)(9)(A)(i),
    (B), (C), or (D),” then you may file a petition for judicial review either with the
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or any court of appeals of
    competent jurisdiction. 2   The court of appeals must receive your petition for
    review within 60 days of the date of issuance of this order. 
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b)(1)
    (B).
    If you submit a petition for judicial review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for
    the Federal Circuit, you must submit your petition to the court at the
    following address:
    U.S. Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    717 Madison Place, N.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20439
    Additional information about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
    Circuit is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular
    relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is
    contained within the court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, 10, and 11.
    If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at
    http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation
    for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The
    Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that
    any attorney will accept representation in a given case.
    2
    The original statutory provision that provided for judicial review of certain
    whistleblower claims by any court of appeals of competent jurisdiction expired on
    December 27, 2017. The All Circuit Review Act, signed into law by the President on
    July 7, 2018, permanently allows appellants to file petitions for judicial review of
    MSPB decisions in certain whistleblower reprisal cases with the U.S. Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit or any other circuit court of appeals of competent jurisdiction.
    The All Circuit Review Act is retroactive to November 26, 2017. 
    Pub. L. No. 115-195, 132
     Stat. 1510.
    6
    Contact information for the courts of appeals can be found at their
    respective websites, which can be accessed through the link below:
    http://www.uscourts.gov/Court_Locator/CourtWebsites.aspx .
    FOR THE BOARD:                       ______________________________
    Gina K. Grippando
    Clerk of the Board
    Washington, D.C.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DC-300A-18-0663-I-1

Filed Date: 2/21/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/22/2024