eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Supreme Court of North Carolina
 1934-05

Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Long , 206 N.C. 477 ( 1934 )


Menu:

  • Civil action to recover on promissory note, secured by deed of trust on land situate in Forsyth County.

    On motion to remove cause to Forsyth County for trial, as a matter of right, there was judgment denying the motion, which was reversed on appeal, opinion filed 10 January, 1934, and certified to the Superior Court of Wake County 24 January. Mortgage Co. v. Long, 205 N.C. 533.

    In the meantime, on 15 January, the plaintiff appeared before the clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County, paid the costs, and moved for voluntary judgment of nonsuit, which was allowed and entered of record. Costs in the Supreme Court were paid 19 January.

    Thereafter, on 2 February, without notice to plaintiff's counsel, judgment was tendered and signed directing the clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County to transfer the action, together with all necessary papers filed therein, to the Superior Court of Forsyth County. Immediately after the signing of this judgment, the defendant filed answer with the clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County setting up a counterclaim for alleged usury.

    The record states that at the time of signing the order of removal, the court was advertent to the fact that a voluntary judgment of nonsuit had previously been entered before the clerk, and that no notice had been given to plaintiff's counsel of the motion then being made for judgment on the certificate.

    Plaintiff appeals, assigning error. after stating the case: Conceding, without deciding, that the judgment of voluntary nonsuit taken before the clerk was ineffectual, *Page 478 because entered prior to receipt of opinion from this Court (Mfg. Co. v.Burton, 105 N.C. 74, 11 S.E. 264, R. R. v. Sanford, 188 N.C. 218,124 S.E. 308, Huntley v. Express Co., 191 N.C. 696, 132 S.E. 786,Bohannon v. Trust Co., 198 N.C. 702, 153 S.E. 263), still it would seem that plaintiff's counsel was entitled to notice of application for judgment on the certificate, so that nonsuit might then be entered before the judge, if the plaintiff so desired. Carpenter v. Hanes, 167 N.C. 551,83 S.E. 577. This right will yet be accorded.

    Error.