State v. Hough , 367 N.C. 79 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
    No. 141PA10
    FILED 27 JUNE 2013
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
    v.
    KERRY McKINLEY HOUGH
    On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. ' 7A-31 of a unanimous
    decision of the Court of Appeals, 
    202 N.C. App. 674
    , 
    690 S.E.2d 285
     (2010), finding
    no error in judgments entered on 10 December 2008 by Judge Calvin E. Murphy in
    Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February
    2013.
    Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O’Brien, Assistant Attorney
    General, and Daniel D. Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the
    State.
    Robert W. Ewing for defendant-appellant.
    PER CURIAM.
    Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
    The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members
    voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of
    Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and
    stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary,
    STATE V. HOUGH
    Opinion of the Court
    
    365 N.C. 305
    , 
    716 S.E.2d 849
     (2011); Goldston v. State, 
    364 N.C. 416
    , 
    700 S.E.2d 223
     (2010).
    AFFIRMED.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 141PA10

Citation Numbers: 367 N.C. 79, 743 S.E.2d 174, 2013 WL 3325154, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 659

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/27/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024