Board of Education v. Hood , 204 N.C. 353 ( 1933 )


Menu:
  • Brogden, J.

    Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.

    Reversed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 204 N.C. 353

Judges: Brogden

Filed Date: 3/15/1933

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024