-
PER Curiam. In Supreme Court the two appeals were heard as one,— plaintiffs assigning many errors based upon exceptions taken in the course of the trial.
However, careful consideration of the evidence offered fails to reveal error of a prejudicial nature sufficient to require disturbing the verdict of the jury as rendered.
As to No. 529— No error.
As to No. 530— No error.
Document Info
Filed Date: 11/22/1961
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024