-
Pee Cueiam. In Batson v. Launcky Co., ante, 371, is tbe following: “In tbe case at bar tbe trial judge beard no evidence and found no facts. Hence, it does not appear whether tbe merits of tbe present case are substantially identical to tbe former case or not. Therefore, tbe Court is of tbe opinion that tbe judgment dismissing tbe action upon tbe plea of estoppel, was prematurely and inadvertently made.” For tbe reasons given, tbe judgment of tbe court below is
Reversed.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 174 S.E. 300, 206 N.C. 911, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 352
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/2/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024