State v. Golphin ( 2020 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 441A98-4
Filed 25 September 2020
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
TILMON CHARLES GOLPHIN
On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order
dismissing defendant’s motion for appropriate relief entered on 25 January 2017 by
Judge W. Erwin Spainhour in Superior Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the
Supreme Court on 27 August 2019.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy
Attorney General, and Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, for
the State-appellee.
Jay H. Ferguson and Kenneth J. Rose for defendant-appellant.
Jeremy M. Falcone, Paul F. Khoury, Robert L. Walker, and Madeline J. Cohen
for Former State and Federal Prosecutors, amici curiae.
Carlos E. Mahoney, Jin Hee Lee, and W. Kerrel Murray for NAACP Legal
Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., amicus curiae.
Janet Moore for National Association for Public Defense, amicus curiae.
James E. Williams, Jr., Burton Craige, and Bidish Sarma for North Carolina
Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.
Grady Jessup for North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers, amicus curiae.
Cynthia F. Adcock for North Carolina Council of Churches, amicus curiae.
Lisa A. Bakale-Wise and Irving Joyner for North Carolina State Conference of
the NAACP, amicus curiae.
STATE V. GOLPHIN
Opinion of the Court
Professors Robert P. Mosteller and John Charles Boger, amici curiae.
Joseph Blocher, for Social Scientists, amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Robinson, No. 411A94-6, 2020 WL 4726680(N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), the decision of the trial court is vacated and this case is
remanded to the Superior Court, Cumberland County, for the reinstatement of
defendant’s sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Chief Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of
this case.
-2-
Justice ERVIN concurring in the result.
If the Court were addressing for the first time the issue of whether the trial
court’s order should be reversed and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon
defendant by Judge Weeks reinstated on double jeopardy and related grounds, I
would dissent from that decision and hold, for the reasons stated in my dissenting
opinion in State v. Robinson, No. 41194-6, 2020WL 4726680 (N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), that
the trial court’s order should be reversed and this case remanded to the Superior
Court, Cumberland County, for a new Racial Justice Act proceeding in accordance
with this Court’s decision in State v. Ramseur, 374 N.C. 658, 843 S.E.2d 106 (2020),
and our 2015 order in this case. The decision of the majority in Robinson is, however,
the law of North Carolina to which I am now bound. For this reason, I concur in the
result reached by the Court in this case.
Justice DAVIS joins in this concurring opinion.
Justice NEWBY dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in State v. Robinson, No.
411A94-6, 2020 WL 4726680 (N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), and State v. Ramseur, 374 N.C.
658, 843 S.E.2d 106 (2020), I respectfully dissent.