State v. Frierson ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute
    controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance
    with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    NO. COA13-1415
    NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
    Filed: 1 July 2014
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
    v.                                           Buncombe County
    No. 11 CRS 60559
    BLADE CHRISTIAN FRIERSON
    Appeal by Defendant from Judgment entered 31 May 2013 by
    Judge C. Philip Ginn in Buncombe County Superior Court. Heard in
    the Court of Appeals 23 June 2014.
    Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General
    Matthew L. Boyatt, for the State.
    David R. Payne, P.A., by David R. Payne, for Defendant.
    STEPHENS, Judge.
    On 31 May 2013,         a jury found              Defendant Blade Christian
    Frierson    guilty     of   driving        while    impaired.     The      trial   court
    sentenced     Defendant     to   a    period       of    120   days   incarceration,
    suspended     the    sentence,       and    placed       defendant    on    supervised
    -2-
    probation for a period of two years.1 Defendant filed notice of
    appeal to this Court on 28 June 2013.
    Before we can reach the merits of Defendant’s appeal, we
    must   determine     whether    we    have     jurisdiction    to    consider        the
    appeal. “[W]hen a defendant has not properly given notice of
    appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.”
    State v. McCoy, 
    171 N.C. App. 636
    , 638, 
    615 S.E.2d 319
    , 320
    (2005). To invoke this Court’s jurisdiction, a defendant must
    give   notice   of   appeal     either    orally    at    trial     or   in   writing
    within fourteen days after entry of judgment in accordance with
    N.C.R. App. P. 4(a). State v. Parker, 
    214 N.C. App. 190
    , 191,
    
    713 S.E.2d 770
    , 771 (2011). ”[A] jurisdictional default brings a
    purported appeal to an end before it ever begins. Moreover, in
    the absence of jurisdiction, the appellate courts lack authority
    to   consider   whether   the     circumstances      of    a   purported       appeal
    justify [the] application of [N.C.R. App. P. 2].” Dogwood Dev. &
    Mgmt. Co. v. White Oak Transp. Co., 
    362 N.C. 191
    , 198, 
    657 S.E.2d 361
    , 365 (2008). As a result, when the record fails to
    show that the appellant gave timely and proper notice of appeal,
    this   Court    is   required    to    dismiss     the    appeal     for      lack   of
    1
    The written judgment is not contained in the record on appeal.
    The sentence imposed by the trial court is obtained from the
    stenographic transcript.
    -3-
    jurisdiction.   State   v.   Hughes,    
    210 N.C. App. 482
    ,   485,   
    707 S.E.2d 777
    , 779 (2011).
    Here, the transcript does not show that Defendant gave oral
    notice of appeal at trial. On the contrary, the trial court’s
    initial appellate entries are dated 19 September 2013 and were
    filed on 24 September 2013. In addition, the record shows that
    Defendant filed written notice of appeal on 28 June 2013, more
    than fourteen days after entry of the 31 May 2013 judgment.2
    Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction to review this appeal.
    Defendant has not acknowledged that his notice of appeal is
    untimely, has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, and
    has not requested that we consider his brief as such a petition.
    Therefore, we decline to treat his brief as a petition for writ
    of certiorari and to consider the merits of this appeal. See
    State v. Inman, 
    206 N.C. App. 324
    , 325-26, 
    696 S.E.2d 567
    , 569
    (2010). Defendant’s appeal is
    DISMISSED.
    Judges HUNTER, ROBERT C., and ERVIN concur.
    Report per Rule 30(e).
    2
    The record contains no explanation for the delay between the
    filing of the notice of appeal and the court’s filing of its
    appellate entries.