In re Buxbaum , 4 F. Cas. 929 ( 1801 )

BROOKS, District Judge.

The question presented by the certificate of Mr. Register Shaffer is, were the specifications of objections to the discharge of the bankrupt properly filed, so that they may be considered by the court? It appears that the meeting of creditors to show cause against the bankrupt’s discharge was duly ordered upon his petition, the required notice and publication made, and the meeting held accordingly, whereat no notice was given by any creditor of a purpose to oppose the discharge. The final oath was administered to the bankrupt, and the meeting adjourned sine die. A paper now appears, purporting to be a notice of opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge, dated 27th July, 1809, the day on which the meeting was held, signed by the solicitors of certain creditors. Upon this paper the clerk indorses, “Filed at Salisbury, August term, 1870;” and the register certifies, “This paper I have never seen before the 1st day of December, 1875.”

It further appears that the specifications of objections were filed with the register August 5th, 1809, nine days after the final meeting was held and adjourned without day. Specifications of grounds of opposition to discharge may be properly filed with the clerk within the ten days allowed by the rule, or the further time which may be allowed by the order of the court; but notice of the intention of the creditor or of the assignee to oppose the discharge must be made known to the register at the final meeting. Then it becomes the duty of the regis- \ ter to adjourn the case into the district | court for further proceedings; but whenever j filed, they can only be considered, and issues i of law or fact arising thereon tried, when filed at the meeting to show cause, or pursuant to notice of opposition then and there given. The specifications in this case were not filed in accordance with any provision of the law. They cannot be considered, and the bankrupt is therefore entitled to his discharge.