Slocum v. Duke Progress Energy ( 2024 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:23-CV-00680-M-RN GEORGE SLOCUM, ) Plaintiff, V. ORDER DUKE PROGRESS ENERGY, ) ) Defendant. ) oo) This matter comes before the court on the memorandum and recommendation (the “Recommendation”) entered by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II in this case on March 19, 2024 [DE 20]. In the Recommendation, Judge Numbers recommends that the court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss. DE 20 at 3, 6, 8. The Recommendation, along with instructions and a deadline for filing objections, was served on the parties on March 19. See id. at 8. Neither party objected to the Recommendation. See Docket Entries dated March 19, 2024, to present. A magistrate judge’s recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . .. recommendation] |... receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); accord Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 271 (1976). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific and timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error” and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Upon careful review of the Recommendation and the record presented, and finding no clear error, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Judge Numbers as its own. For the reasons stated therein, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [DE 13] is GRANTED, and the Complaint [DE 1] is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SOORDERED this J& _ day of April, 2024. Old Ee RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE