All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court, E.D. North Carolina |
2024-08 |
- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:23-CV-00587-M-KS MICHAEL MCNAIR, ) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TSA, et al., ) Defendants. eee) This matter comes before the court on the memorandum and recommendation (the “Recommendation” entered by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank in this case on July 11, 2024 [DE 15]. In the Recommendation, Judge Swank recommends that the court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss on grounds of subject matter jurisdiction and deny as moot Defendants’ motion to stay discovery. DE 15 at 1, 7-8, 11-12. The Recommendation, along with instructions and a deadline for filing objections, was served on Plaintiff on July 11. See id. at 12. Plaintiff raised no objection to the Recommendation. See Docket Entries dated July 11, 2024, to present. A magistrate judge’s recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . .. recommendation{ ] . . . receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); accord Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 271 (1976). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific and timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error” and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Upon careful review of the Recommendation and the record presented, the court finds no clear error. See Diamond, 416 F.3d at 315. The court thus ADOPTS the Recommendation [DE 15] in full. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [DE 4] is GRANTED on grounds of subject matter jurisdiction, and Defendants’ motion to stay discovery [DE 8] is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Complaint [DE 1-1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED this __ © day of August, 2024. aati ae RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Info
Docket Number: 5:23-cv-00587
Filed Date: 8/7/2024
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024