Stanly v. . Cummins , 1 N.C. 21 ( 1789 )

WILLIAMS, J., said it was simply a demand for so much money. said the jury were sworn to ascertain the damages sustained, and they might consider the difference in the value of money.

The other Judges assented, but without charging the jury.

All the Judges present.

NOTE. — Such a note would not be negotiable. See Hodges v.Clinton, post, 53, and the cases there referred to in the note.

(22)