Allen v. . Stokes , 2 N.C. 122 ( 1794 )

This is an issue to be determined by the Court, and that the writ and declaration was proof of the amount of the plaintiff's demand, and as the sum demanded in the writ and declaration was above the sum of £ 50, they ordered a respondeas ouster. Quere de hoc.

See McNaughton v. Hunter, post, 454; Bell v. Bell, 5 N.C. 95; McGheev. Draughon, 4 N.C. 240.