Harrison v. Harrison. ( 1805 )

The rule is, if the verdict in the present case cannot be given in evidence in the suit against the witness, he shall be deemed disinterested; and it is no exception to the rule that he conceives himself interested, when in reality he is not.

He was sworn, and proved the detainer, and plaintiff had a verdict and judgment.

NOTE. — See Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2, and the note thereto.

Cited: Mull v. Martin, 85 N.C. 406.