-
took time to consider; and after two or three days directed the costs to be paid by the complainant. He said there had been a careless delay on the part of the complainant; and the defendant had a right to ascertain, by putting the complainant to prove, whether there had been such a contract, and whether it had been executed on (362) the side of complainant. He had therefore done nothing amiss, and should not be compelled to pay the costs.
NOTE — See White v. Thompson,
21 N.C. 493 ; see, also, Tindall v.Mounger,5 N.C. 290 . *Page 319
Document Info
Judges: HALL, J.,
Filed Date: 7/5/1805
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016