Mallett v. London. , 3 N.C. 158 ( 1801 )

Hall, Judge.

He did not complete his first garnishment, but; something remained to be done. — /.The second is a continuation; of the first, and as if done at the same time with the first; and aa. the second garnishment discloses property enough to satisfy the,, plaintiff’s demand there should be judgment for him.

Judgment accordingly,,.