-
was of opinion for the plaintiffs, and directed the jury to find for them, which they did; and there was judgment for the plaintiffs, after a new trial had been moved for.
NOTE. — See Sutton v. Wood,
1 N.C. 399 ; Bryson v. Davidson,5 N.C. 143 ;Pendleton v. Pendleton,6 N.C. 82 ; Wooten v. Shelton, ibid., 188; Jones v. Spaight,4 N.C. 157 ; Davidson v. Davidson,8 N.C. 163 ;Sanders v. Hyatt, ibid., 247; Bailey v. Davis,9 N.C. 108 ; Beasley v.Whitehurst, ibid., 437. By the act of 1827 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 122, sec. 11) the law on this subject is altered.Cited: Rice v. Satterwhite,
21 N.C. 71 ; Buchanan v. Buchanan,99 N.C. 311 .
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 3 N.C. 356
Judges: Judge
Filed Date: 7/5/1805
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024