Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group , 2003 ND 8 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • Filed 1/17/03 by Clerk of Supreme Court

    IN THE SUPREME COURT

    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

      

      

      

    2003 ND 2

      

      

      

    Kim Perteet Downing, Claimant and Appellant

      

    v.

      

    North Dakota Workers

    Compensation Bureau,                                                                                    Appellee

            and

    Pro-Serve Corporation, Respondent

      

      

      

    No. 20020257

      

      

      

    Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge.

      

    AFFIRMED.

      

    Per Curiam.

      

    Kipton R. Van Voorhis, Spaeth, Thelen, Van Voorhis & Jasmer, 115 S. 5th Street, Grand Forks, ND 58201-4646, for claimant and appellant.

      

    Jacqueline S. Anderson, Special Assistant Attorney General, Nilles, Hansen & Davies, Ltd., 1800 Radisson Tower, 201 5th Street N., P.O. Box 2626, Fargo, ND 58108-2626, for appellee.

    Downing v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau

    No. 20020257

      

    Per Curiam.

    [¶1] Kim Perteet Downing (“Perteet”) appealed from a district court judgment affirming a final order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (“Bureau”) denying Perteet medical expenses after December 1, 1995, and awarding disability benefits from October 6, 1993 to October 27, 1993.  Perteet appealed to the district court asserting the Bureau’s order “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.”  No other document listing any specifications of error was filed.  The district court, despite a review of the record, could not find anything unfair in the manner in which the proceeding was handled.  Perteet appealed to this Court arguing the Bureau’s decision “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence and that Ms. Perteet was not given a fair hearing.”  Perteet’s notice of appeal is so general it could apply to any administrative agency appeal.  Perteet failed to satisfy the specificity requirement of N.D.C.C. § 28-32-42(4); thus the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).   See Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Comp. Bureau , 554 N.W.2d 451, 454 (N.D. 1996).

    [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

    Carol Ronning Kapsner

    Mary Muehlen Maring

    William A. Neumann

    Dale V. Sandstrom

      

Document Info

Docket Number: 20020209

Citation Numbers: 2003 ND 8

Filed Date: 1/17/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2016