Holkesvig v. Maring , 2016 ND 109 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Filed 6/2/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

    IN THE SUPREME COURT

    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

      

      

      

    2016 ND 109

      

      

      

    Randy Holkesvig, Plaintiff and Appellant

      

    v.

      

    Mary Muehlen Maring, in her Individual

    capacity and official capacity as a

    former North Dakota Supreme Court Justice

    and currently sitting as a Surrogate Judge,

    and the State of North Dakota, Defendants and Appellees

      

      

      

    No. 20150247

      

      

      

    Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.

      

    AFFIRMED.

      

    Per Curiam.

      

    Randy Holkesvig, self-represented, P.O. Box 82, Fargo, N.D. 58107-0082, plaintiff and appellant; on brief.

      

    Douglas A. Bahr, Office of the Attorney General, 500 North Ninth Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for defendants and appellees; on brief.

    Holkesvig v. Maring

    No. 20150247

      

    Per Curiam.

    [¶1] Randy Holkesvig appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint against the State and former Justice Mary Muehlen Maring and from a district court order denying his motion for relief.  The district court dismissed Holkesvig’s complaint under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b), concluding it did not have jurisdiction because Holkesvig did not comply with the procedural requirements established in Holkesvig v. Rost , 2015 ND 67, ¶ 4, 861 N.W.2d 488.  Holkesvig moved for relief, and the district court denied his motion because Holkesvig did not file and serve notice of the motion as N.D.R.Ct. 3.2 requires and he failed to identify the rule under which he moved for relief.  Holkesvig argues the district court erred in dismissing his complaint, because a petition for rehearing was still pending in Rost and a mandate had not been issued when the State moved to dismiss.  He also argues the court erred in denying his motion for relief.  We recently addressed these arguments in Holkesvig v. VandeWalle , 2016 ND 107.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (6), and (7).

    [¶2] Dale V. Sandstrom, Acting C.J.

    Daniel J. Crothers

    Lisa Fair McEvers

    Carol Ronning Kapsner

    Ronald E. Goodman, S.J.

      

    [¶3] The Honorable Ronald E. Goodman, S.J., sitting in place of VandeWalle, C.J., disqualified.

Document Info

Docket Number: 20150247

Citation Numbers: 2016 ND 109

Filed Date: 6/2/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/2/2016