State v. Koon , 2022 ND 142 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                 FILED
    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    JULY 21, 2022
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    
    2022 ND 142
    State of North Dakota,                                  Plaintiff and Appellee
    v.
    Jerome Wesseh Koon, Jr.,                            Defendant and Appellant
    No. 20220018
    Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District,
    the Honorable Thomas R. Olson, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.
    Per Curiam.
    Joshua J. Traiser, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and
    appellee.
    Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
    State v. Koon
    No. 20220018
    Per Curiam.
    [¶1] Jerome Koon appeals from a criminal judgment in which he was found
    guilty of reckless endangerment and unlawful possession of a firearm, among
    other convictions, and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for those
    convictions. Koon argues the evidence was insufficient to support his
    conviction for reckless endangerment because he acted in self-defense and
    withdrew from the encounter before he shot at the victim. Koon argues the
    evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for unlawful possession of a
    firearm because he was excused from the conduct.
    [¶2] Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdicts, we
    conclude substantial evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a
    reasonable inference in favor of conviction. State v. Samaniego, 
    2022 ND 38
    , ¶
    7, 
    970 N.W.2d 222
     (cleaned up) (“A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the
    evidence on appeal must show that the evidence, when viewed in the light most
    favorable to the verdict, reveals no reasonable inference of guilt.”); State v.
    Eggleston, 
    2020 ND 68
    , ¶ 11, 
    940 N.W.2d 645
     (When reviewing the evidence in
    the light most favorable to the verdict, and recognizing there may be
    contradictory facts, we determine whether there were sufficient facts for a
    reasonable fact finder to determine that the defendant was not acting in self-
    defense.). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
    [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
    Gerald W. VandeWalle
    Daniel J. Crothers
    Lisa Fair McEvers
    Jerod E. Tufte
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20220018

Citation Numbers: 2022 ND 142

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 7/21/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/1/2022